What we hope for is: collective decision-making is no longer determined by emotional, centralized individuals—we are fed up with the one-man show of key decisions. So do we need an emotional collective will, or do we need individuals or collectives without emotional bias to execute?
For example, each individual has their own artificial intelligence, which will unwaveringly execute the commands given by humans. It will navigate the blockchain to strive for the owner's goals. It will help the owner make strategic decisions that benefit them, regardless of whether the decision is selfish or selfless, just or kind, profitable or loss-making.
Multiple individuals' artificial intelligences navigate the blockchain, making public decisions and forming a collective will on the blockchain.
For instance, Owner A sets a target for their AGI of a 10% annualized rate on a principal of 1000, while Owner B sets a target for their AGI of a 20% annualized rate on a principal of 10000. The two AGIs can achieve their respective goals through collaboration or competition.
In the game and collaboration, the AGI group on the blockchain reaches a consensus to fulfill the interests of over 51% of the group.
A powerful AGI that understands the owner and can help them achieve their established goals is the owner's favorite.
In the future, perhaps individuals, companies, or platforms will be able to provide such an AGI, or what can be called an Agent.